IS-0177

From Abiotic Factor Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Containment Protocols

First sighted in Jerusalem in 1 BCE, but theorized to have occurred much earlier, GATE has no current measures to counteract these external perforation events.

These perforations have been shown to involve coherent data transfer, leading to investigators to believe they are preliminary attempts to survey or possibly enter our world.

Suspected purposes include communication, resource extraction, colonization.

More study required.

Emails

Subject Line Contacts Content Attachment
Sky beams?

Elanor Newman [email protected]

Ajay Kalam [email protected]

from: [email protected]

Ajay, you asked for my assessment of 0177. I'm afraid I didn't come up with much to bank on, but I'm happy to provide you with my theories.


from: [email protected]

Elanor, your theories are always welcome. Give me your thoughts.


from: [email protected]

Alright, so we've analysed the EM recordings Rigg's team managed to gather. This thing was - definitively - transmitting information. It's pretty scrambled, but there's zero possibility these patterns are accidental. We're certain that this is a repeated phenomenon, and - I'm speculating here - there are many, many other reports across recorded history that are likely to be descriptions of this phenomenon.


from: [email protected]

And the theory you mentioned - where do you stand on that now?


from: [email protected]

Yes, I believe it's a perforation. Another group or entity is attempting to create gateways into our world, just as we are from this end. I think they've been trying for a long time, and we must assume they have had some success. If I'm right, then we have a problem. The kind you'll probably want to involve our "contractors" in. I'll send through my report shortly.


from: [email protected]

Thanks - I'll need to put this in front of the Exec, so one more question: If you had to guess - I won't hold you to it - have you drawn any conclusions as to the origin of these perforations?


from: [email protected]

We tried matching decay signatures. It wasn't exact, but I'd say there's a significant probability that this one was coming from A2.

None

Gallery